Ellen had a clear idea, unlike some of her friends, of what she needed, having already worked as a summer intern in a non-governmental organization in her hometown. In college she was active in programs and associations working for community welfare. Some of us are under misconceptions about the work environment being laid back or different from regular profit-making concerns. It is the other way around, as workers in a non-profit organization are dedicated towards whatever they are doing; the difference is in the flexibility towards a particular task. Since profit is not a criterion, non-profit jobs require a clearer approach to work and the implementation of programs.
For a graduate seriously looking at non-profit jobs, check sites , the best places to check them out are Volunteer and Public Service offices, the Internet and alumni networks. International agencies require work experience for salaried positions. But you can join as an intern or volunteer, and work your way through the organization. Ellen preferred an organization from within her state and approached her previous employer. Volunteer and internship experiences are valued by prospective employers. Another plus point in her resume was her credits in business and nonprofit management.
Within a week Ellen was asked to join, and anticipated a fulfilling experience towards community welfare, albeit from behind a desk.
Non Profit Organizations provides detailed information on Non Profit Organizations, Nonprofit Software, Nonprofit Jobs, Nonprofit Debt Consolidations and more. Non Profit Organizations is affiliated with Non profit Jobs.
Mission and Collaboration
Working for non profit organizations, consultants generally agree that no one chooses charity work for the money. Mission, as the Brookings survey indicates, remains the attraction for nonprofit workers. Among the other factors that enhance employees' job satisfaction are flexibility, collaborative decision making, and acknowledgment of employees as well-rounded human beings as opposed to simply workers, say charity leaders.
At Girls Inc. of Greater Atlanta, an affiliate of the national youth-development charity, the executive director, Janet J. Street, says that last winter she sought ideas from her entire staff to deal with a downturn in donations.
"We came together and did a round robin to decide what to do to help stay afloat," she says. This inclusive approach, she says, helps employees feel valued and makes even tough choices -- such as the group's recent layoffs, the first in its 26-year history -- more understandable to them. "It's not just a top-down, it's a bottom-up organization," she says. "It flows both ways."
At Project Hope, in Dorchester, Mass., a Catholic charity that aids low-income families with housing, education, and child care, staff members were asked to help hammer out a code of ethics that would govern workplace behavior, says Sister Margaret A. Leonard, the group's executive director. The code prohibited such behavior as engaging in negative gossip. "People honor that," she says. "and if someone steps out of bounds, someone else reminds them."
The organization also looks to provide flexibility and care for the specific needs of its work force. Many of its 45 employees, says Sister Margaret, come from the neighborhood the charity serves, and many do not have college degrees.
The charity has provided time off for workers in its child-care center to take classes on-site to help them reach their personal and professional goals, a program made possible by Massachusetts' policy of allowing social-services workers to take some college courses for free. Project Hope's effort is working so well, says the group's leader, that it will soon be expanded to all of the charity's employees.
Not all benefits that help keep non-profit workers on the job come from employers, says Sister Margaret. Having one's efforts affirmed by clients, she says, can be a powerful incentive to keep working. At Project Hope, she says, "most of these women are so valued by the families that are struggling. They're appreciated for who they are, not just what they do."
Scant Resources and Burnout
Although the Brookings survey suggests that charity employees appear to be an upbeat, motivated work force, signs point to problems inherent in their field. "They love their jobs," says Mr. Light, "but it's not entirely clear that society and their organizations always love them back."
The survey confirms what has been a notorious equation in the field: Overwork minus resources equals burnout. At least one in five respondents reported that they only rarely or sometimes have access to the training, technology, labor, and other resources needed to do their jobs well.
Part of the problem, says Ms. Street, is the societal expectation that a charity should operate on a shoestring.
Regrettably," she says, "there's a mentality in our country that people in nonprofits aren't supposed to make money that they're not supposed to have all the resources necessary, and if you do, then people even begin to frown on that." This expectation of poverty can lead to self-sabotage for nonprofit organizations, she says. Ms. Street recalls a conflict she had in the early '80s with her group's board: The board had demanded that the charity's correspondence appear neater and more professional -- yet initially resisted her requests to buy a new typewriter equipped with a correction ribbon.
Nonprofit employees are so dedicated to their work of helping others, says Mr. Light, that they may be in danger of being exploited by their organizations. Although she says she has never seen a case of deliberate exploitation, organizations can ask too much of employees in the name of saving sparse resources, says Leyna Bernstein, director of consulting services for the Management Center, a nonprofit consulting organization in San Francisco. Some groups may classify what would usually be hourly-wage workers as salaried employees, and not pay them for overtime. In some cases, she says, employees "are racking up hundreds of hours of quote-unquote comp time that they'll never be able to take."
Charities may need to pay more attention to the ways in which they contend with workers who aren't performing up to standards, according to the Brookings survey. The survey's finding about poor performers may indicate a systemic problem for some needy organizations, says John Manzon-Santos, executive director of the Asian & Pacific Islander Wellness Center, an AIDS-services charity in San Francisco.
"People feel that if salaries are lower and people are working for the mission of an organization, sometimes it's hard to hold people accountable. The trade-off is, 'Well, you know, they work hard, they're committed, they're here,'" he says. Regardless, he adds, "It's really important to hold ourselves to standards."
Ms. Street, who says she thinks the nonprofit world has no greater share of troublesome employees than does the for-profit world, notes that most charity managers do not, unlike their counterparts in government and businesses, have human-resources departments that they can turn to for guidance and support.
Charity employers often have a difficult time putting together personnel policies, including disciplinary procedures, says Shelley A. Davis, a program officer at the Joyce Foundation, in Chicago, who works on helping her organization's grantees build their organizational structure. "They've risen up through the ranks by working on their issue," she notes. "They don't necessarily know how to manage people." Trustees from the business world should lend a hand to their executive directors in these areas, she says.
Nonprofit employers can take many practical steps to help keep their motivated work force happy and productive, say charity leaders and consultants. They can start by keeping their expectations realistic, says Mr. Manzon-Santos, when advertising non profit job postings.
"Oftentimes, missions for nonprofits have pretty tall orders, whether it's to cure AIDS or it's to house everybody in a certain area," he says. "These are pretty amazing, beautiful, important, crucial visions. And so, the work is never done, by definition. It is important for employers to acknowledge that. For people to feel like they're making a difference, the employer has to say upfront, 'This is what we're going to do. This is the size of the bite we're going to take.' It's crucial, because if we say, 'We have to change the world and that's the standard of whether we're successful,' it's going to feel unsatisfying to an employee."
Using volunteers to their fullest potential can also help ease staff members' burdens, says Ms. Brooks of Second Helpings. Although her four-year-old group has grown about 25 percent each year in the amount of service it provides, she says it is rare for staff members to work more than 40 hours a week, due to the charity's reliance on its 250 active volunteers. The charity recently hired its first manager of volunteers and uses a database to help match volunteers' skills with tasks it needs done, from data entry to driving the food trucks to helping to write grant proposals. "If we didn't have them," she says of her volunteers, "we'd either have to double our staff or we'd all be keeling over."
Nonprofit employers can also try a variety of low-cost perks to boost workers' satisfaction, from supporting professional development (even just by offering comp time), to letting employees try new tasks, to offering chances to represent the charity sector and organization in the media, says Ms. Davis.
Chief among the nonprofit field's managerial virtues, says Mr. Manzon-Santos, are those that come from some of its biggest problems: being lean and hungry.
"There is more flexibility in nonprofits to work beyond our four walls," he says. "We have to be scrappier about resources, and we have to work harder at building relationships. And so there is a kind of polygamist nature to how we operate -- we play well with others. So I think that's a lesson: There's got to be more faith that collaboration can create a one-plus-one-equals-three situation."
The mission, though, remains the field's most powerful solution to workplace problems. "There's a high sense of pride," says Ms. Boxx. "And that goes a long way toward sticking it out through some tough times."
In your experience, are nonprofit workers as satisfied with their jobs as the Brookings Institution survey claims? Share your thoughts in the Job bank online forum.